Monday, March 31, 2008

Hillary's Evil Walmart


*** UPDATE 4/2/08 *** CNN is reporting that Walmart is backing down. Thanks to everyone that cried foul! We Win! Read more here.

________________
I am so glad that Hillary had such a positive impact on Walmart for its workers as a member of their Board of Directors for 6 years. Especially regarding health care, her "life's work" as she put it.

Apparently it made such a great impression that they sued a woman who just lost her son in the Iraq war, after she was in a traffic accident and is now severely brain damaged. They sued her for all the damages she won in a civil suit. Over $400,000 to re-coup medical payouts under her health insurance. That leaves this woman practically penniless with only government disability benefits for her care. Her husband divorced her so she could get a few dollars more under this government plan. BTW - she has severe memory loss, so when the woman asks about her son in Iraq each day, she weeps upon hearing the news of his death as if it is the first time. Walmart should be ashamed. Now that is an American company you can be proud of!

So what about Hillary at Walmart? She did nothing about working conditions, she did nothing to help women get equal pay at Walmart, she did nothing for workers' health care, she did nothing to help workers organize but she did get paid $1,500 per board meeting. She also accumulated $100,000 in Walmart stock in addition to $18,000 per year as a board member. If that is leadership you can be proud of, then vote for Hillary!

McCain Introduced - War in His Blood

Why is the media giving McCain a HUGE pass on Iraq. This guy was in Iraq the day before it descended into chaos. Basra is in tatters, rockets are falling in the green zone. Maybe he should go back and take a scroll down Baghdad's main street with that traitor Lieberman.

This former POW, Navy brat, Panamanian child has been breed and raised with war in his blood.

His life is all about war, not peace. What hope do we have of ever finding peace on this Earth with a war monger at the helm. He already has shown a willingness to fight forever in Iraq, no matter the cost. This blind zealotry will lead this country to ruin. Great leaders find ways NOT to use America's military might. What type of compassion does this man have when he is willing to put the interest of Iraq's civil war above the interest of our solders on repeated tours of duty. What about the thousands of US service men and women with sever injuries, what about the over 4000 dead Americans. Will there be 4000 more under John McCain? Tens of thousands more injured. What will he have to pay to get volunteers to fight his hundred year war?

Bowling - Republicans vs. Democrats




Take a CLOSE look at these bowlers. Look at their forward foot. Whose foot crosses the foul line?

Just more proof that Republicans cheat, even at bowling.
I must say, that Obama bowls as well as I do and that isn't very good!

Clinton's Bosnia Lie Gets Worse!


From the Huffington Post....

The Bosnian girl who famously read a poem to Hillary Rodham Clinton during her 1996 visit to the war-torn country is shocked - and her countrymen infuriated - that the former first lady claimed to have dodged sniper fire that day.

Emina Bicakcic, now 20 and studying to become a doctor, told The Post she stood on the tarmac at the air base in Tuzla, greeted Clinton and even had time to share the lines of verse she'd written - all without fear of attack from an unseen enemy.

Keep reading the story from the NY Post.

Read more blogs and news about the controversy surrounding Hillary's Bosnia trip.

Friday, March 28, 2008

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Stop the Hillary Beast From Destroying the Party!


Supers! It is time to step up, NOW! Hillary is hell bent on tearing down the party in a year when we have the best chance to win the Presidency.

Stop sitting on your hands and stick your neck out for the good of the party. There is a tipping point where we will loss voters to McCain. You need to step in now and get Hillary out before we all end up in a McCain Depression.

You CAN be Super Heroes... we need you to SAVE THE DAY!

Hillary's Bosnia Trip Illustrated

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Clinton is Tonya Harding



The only way for her to win is to completely "knee cap" Obama.

Clinton is no longer a Democrat by any definition.

She is a horrible political beast that needs to be stopped.

Inserting race, lying and saying a Republican is better then any Dem is completely EVIL!

Enough is enough!

Superdelegates please step up and take a side to end this.

We want to win in November, Clinton is totally preventing a Democrat winning in November.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Happy Anniversary McCain - 4000 US Soldiers Dead

Their blood is on your hands!

McCain, Bush, Cheney and the rest of the war mongers will burn in hell for their arrogance, incompetence and betrayal of real American values.

Watch the Whole Sermon!

We are letting the media and the Republicans lead us, like sheep, to ignorance.

I was SHOCKED when I watched the whole sermon.

The media clips are TOTALLY taken out of context and spliced together in a way for the worst possible impact.

Be a THINKING American and and make your own judgment.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Is Hillary Waiting for an Assassin?

If MI and FL will not count. If the math does not work. If super delagates like Richardson are going for Obama then why in the world is she still in this race.

The only way she can be the nominee is if Obama were killed.

So is that where we are. Is this some kind of Dead Pool?

Hillary has a truly sick mind.

Is Hillary Running for McCain's VP?

I just listened to Bill Clinton say that a race for president between Hillary and McCain would be between "two people who love their country". What the hell is that? He is really saying that Obama does not. That is total crap and another line that no Democrat should cross... along with the "Hillary and McCain have passed Commander-in-chief test".

I am having a special little ceremony tonight to burn my signed Bill Clinton picture. No Democrat I know would do such a lowly thing as the Clinton's are.

Video Link

Double Standard - Wright vs. McCain's Parsley

Why when Wright suggests that America has been a place where blacks have been killed, it is "Racist", but when McCain's spiritual adviser says it... it is OK?

Take a listen:

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Clinton Against NAFTA? - Her Schedule Tells the Truth


From MSNBC:

'NAFTA briefing drop-by'

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:14 PM by Mark

From NBC's Mark Murray
With a hat tip to the Politico's Ben Smith, will this end up being the biggest news from the release of Clinton's White House schedules? The AP writes: "She was also involved in helping her husband win congressional approval of the North American Free Trade Agreement, a deal she now criticizes and says she would try to change."

Here's the entry from the schedule on November 10, 1993:
NAFTA BRIEFING DROP-BY
Room.450, OEOB
CLOSED PRESS
PARTICIPANTS: Approx. 120 expected to attend (See briefing book for further info]
FORMAT:
- Alexis Herman intros HRC for brief remarks
- HRC concludes program
Staff Contact: Doris Matsui

What Have Popular Preachers Said...

Obama's preacher is not the first to say inflammatory remarks.

There is a great article on The Thirty Year Itch website with many quotes from the past that I encourage you to read:

http://thethirtyyearitch.blogspot.com/2008/03/red-herring-and-false-dilemma.html

McCain & Clinton - Senior Moments

It appears that while Obama was delivering one of the most thoughtful speeches in recent American history that both McCain and Clinton has some trouble remembering the facts related to foreign policy.

McCain spoke of Iran's support for Al Qaeda in Iraq repeatedly which was inaccurate. He needed Lieberman to whisper in his ear before he stopped repeating the wrong information. Read more: click

Clinton was recalling a trip to Africa she took with Joe Wilson. Well, it turns out that trip never actually happened. Read more: click

I am a bit uncomfortable that both Clinton and especially McCain seem to have trouble remembering things correctly.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Every Young American Should Watch this Speech

Obama's Speech on Race in America March 18, 2008

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama
"A More Perfect Union"
Constitution Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union."

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either "too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:

"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about...memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild."

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students.

Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today's urban and rural communities.

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family, contributed to the erosion of black families - a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It's a racial stalemate we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative - notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen - is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and we want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.

There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today - a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother's problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because of Ashley."

"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Are You Better Off Than 4 Years Ago, The Clintons Sure Are!

The polls show most Americans saying they are worse off now than 4 years ago. I am one of those Americans. The medical bills are higher, the raises smaller, I am working longer, we have had to cancel vacations and struggle pay check to pay check.

Put in a political perspective, I am voting for Change this November for many reasons but my "economy" is the main reason.

I really like Obama's open approach to his record and finances. It is all on the table.

But were is Hillary's information? She claims great things but is it all talk? There is very little to back up her claims as first lady. They refuse to release her schedules but that is small potatoes compared to the secrets in those financial records.

What about the $500 MILLION raised for Bill's library? Who were those contributors? What did they get for their donation?

A simple gesture of releasing their 2007 tax returns has not been done. What gives there? There seems to be something to hide. I bet if they do release them it will not be a complete accounting.

Hillary represents the worst of the worst kind of politician. She lies about the records of others while lying about and hiding her own. She's involved is a cover up of records that could help people make an informed decision about voting. Her whole persona is throwing mud, wallowing in political filth and pure lies.

So what makes her the "worst of the worst"? She is doing it for no other purpose then self gratification while taking the Democratic party down along with her. In her warped, depraved mind it is win at all costs and damn those that get in the way.

I for one, believe that there are lines that should not be crossed. Integrity is a value that must be represented by our candidate. Obama has shown it by being an open book. He is not a perfect person but one that believes that people, when given good information, will make the right decision.

If the Clinton's can give themselves a $5 million dollar loan then we ought to know where they got the money. Simple. Be honest with us. Has Hillary or Bill crossed any lines financially? They have done great under Bush's economy, certainly better than me and anyone that I know. Why?

Again, integrity is at stake. What should we believe... her words or her records?

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Repeating History?

As a political scientist I am fascinated and dismayed by the way that history continues to repeat itself. Just as biologic evolution is slow, so too, is political evolution.

I was re-reading passages from a phenomenal book called A Short History of Byzantium. It is the story of the Byzantine empire with its center in Constantinople (now Istanbul, Turkey). If you ever thought that movies today were too unrealistic because they are so violent, this book proves that reality can be far more horrible than fiction. The graphic detail of the atrocities that people commit against each other in the name of power and religion is truly appalling.

A quick glimpse at the news on any given day shows how little we have progressed over the last 1000 years. A look at Iraq is a good case study for this. I read yesterday about the terrible torture that is being committed EVERY DAY in Iraq. People kidnapped, finger nails pulled out, skin scrapped off and eventually shot in the head. But why?

The terrible truth is that our primal nature quickly descends into our most basic familiarity thrown against our fear of that which is different. In Iraq it is Sunni against Shiite, or the powerful (USA) against the insurgents, or local residents against foreign Al Quidea fighters, even man against women. How far is our great nation divided from these most basic tendencies?

Before you answer that, you must look at what a unique thing is our country's founding was. A basic rattling of the dynastic politics of the time. Something that truly inspired the world and transformed the World.

We, as Americans, do something that is truly unique. We have lived in a diverse culture for 100s of years without killing each other (For the most part... make no mistake, we have had our bloody moments).

Strip away a few of our social structures or put us in stress, and suddenly, we fall back into the most basic divisions once again. 9/11 has made us fearful of all Muslims, we are willing to allow 1984 type intrusions into our personal lives. We give legitimacy to the poorest of leadership ability (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzalez and "Brownie"). And we continue to fear Vietnam-type failure in Iraq so that we can't bring ourselves to force the right thing... an exit from Iraq.

These fears also bubble into the bastions of the so-called Progressive world. Need examples:
Fear of the "black" man means that Democratic little old white women vote in droves for Clinton. Supported by fear mongering 3AM ads and not so veils "He is not a Muslim as far as I know".

And what about that 90%+ support for Obama among African Americans. Take race away and would he still be the choice of 90%?

So here we are in the year 2008 and we still act in ways that confirm our primal nature... our most basic familiarity thrown again against our fear of that which is different.

But we do have a chance. A chance to prove that we are smarter, more evolved than our fear suggests. Can we break the chains of repeating history? Can we finally take a step forward for the sake of rational hope? Do we have the strength to stand again our basic fears and attempt to move beyond them?

Obama embodies what our future can be. Move beyond fear and start acting in ways that are right. Get out of a stupid war and do not start another one. Focus our energy on lifting our nation out of a foreboding terrible recession. Save our environment. Give our children the spirit of potential and love rather than fear of the unknown and the unfamiliar.

Take the time to think about it. Do you want our politics to TRULY evolve? Will we take this oh so rare opportunity to do great things or will we suffer the same divisive reality that we are all too familiar with. This is our chance to again transform the World, do not squander it!

Friday, March 14, 2008

On My Faith and My Church by Barack Obama

The pastor of my church, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who recently preached his last sermon and is in the process of retiring, has touched off a firestorm over the last few days. He's drawn attention as the result of some inflammatory and appalling remarks he made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents.

Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue.

Because these particular statements by Rev. Wright are so contrary to my own life and beliefs, a number of people have legitimately raised questions about the nature of my relationship with Rev. Wright and my membership in the church. Let me therefore provide some context.

As I have written about in my books, I first joined Trinity United Church of Christ nearly twenty years ago. I knew Rev. Wright as someone who served this nation with honor as a United States Marine, as a respected biblical scholar, and as someone who taught or lectured at seminaries across the country, from Union Theological Seminary to the University of Chicago. He also led a diverse congregation that was and still is a pillar of the South Side and the entire city of Chicago. It's a congregation that does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day, through ministries ranging from housing the homeless to reaching out to those with HIV/AIDS.

Most importantly, Rev. Wright preached the gospel of Jesus, a gospel on which I base my life. In other words, he has never been my political advisor; he's been my pastor. And the sermons I heard him preach always related to our obligation to love God and one another, to work on behalf of the poor, and to seek justice at every turn.

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church.

Let me repeat what I've said earlier. All of the statements that have been the subject of controversy are ones that I vehemently condemn. They in no way reflect my attitudes and directly contradict my profound love for this country.

With Rev. Wright's retirement and the ascension of my new pastor, Rev. Otis Moss, III, Michelle and I look forward to continuing a relationship with a church that has done so much good. And while Rev. Wright's statements have pained and angered me, I believe that Americans will judge me not on the basis of what someone else said, but on the basis of who I am and what I believe in; on my values, judgment and experience to be President of the United States.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Limbaugh Republicans Making an Impact

*** Update *** Now Wired is reporting on the Ohio results and how many Republicans voted for Hillary just to mess things up. It turns out to be a large number:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/03/did-ohio-crosso.html
___________________
This article is from Politico.com, basically Republicans are screwing with the Democratic primaries by voting for Hillary. How else could she have received such a high "white" voter turnout which goes again all the previous polling numbers:
___________________

The Mississippi Republicans

The pro-Obama Jed Report has some interesting numbers linking Clinton's Republican support in Mississippi with the quarter of the people who voted for Clinton who say they like McCain and that they don't like her.

Without the cross-tabs -- and someone who has the cross-tabs can check this -- you can't say for sure that those are the same people.

But it's an interesting suggestion that Clinton benefited from the support of Republicans who don't plan to vote for her in the general election.

The question then, a pollster points out to me, is whether (as Jed argues) they were Limbaugh voters turning out to make trouble; or whether they were expressing a sincere desire to stop Obama, for reasons of race or others.

Jed's theory is the former. I'll be interested to see what others who look at the numbers decide.

Olbermann "Special Comment" on Hillary Tonight

*** Update ***

Keith Olbermann delivered one of the best commentaries so far this election season. You could feel his absolute pain to have to lambaste someone he obviously used to admire.

His points about the shady campaign tricks of the Hillary Clinton were perfectly explained. It really does appear that Hillary is using the Republican playbook to take down and the positive candidacy of Obama and the whole Democratic party along with him.

I no longer can, with a clean conscious, go and vote for Hillary. Her remarks about Obama being unqualified while saying McCain was, went over the line, and the blatant attempt to insert race into the contest for Pennsylvania truly makes me sick.

If by some travesty created by evil, she gets the nomination. I am sitting it out.

Olberman Special Comment Video

_______________
Well, you knew this was coming considering the lies and distortions that Hillary has been pretty much getting away with in the media. The "Refs" aka The Media has done a terrible job of fact checking and following up on Clinton false attacks and claims.

This is long over due and I hope opens the flood gates on her. She was able to go negative in Ohio without impunity and that is in part due to the media being so easily sucked into the Clinton spin machine.

True, the media is not perfect, but we do rely on them for some sort of check and balance against this type of dirty politics.

I think that the Ferraro comments are the straw that breaks the camel's back here. To suggest that somehow being a black man in America gives you vast advantages over a rich, well connected white women is absolutely insane.

I look forward to hearing Olbermann tonight.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Hillary Lying About Bosnia

So Hillary has said she is tested because of her "harrowing" experience in Bosnia.

In her Iowa stump speech, Clinton also said, "We used to say in the White House that if a place is too dangerous, too small or too poor, send the First Lady."

Well, I just love this line from the comedian Sinbad who accompanied her:

"What kind of president would say, 'Hey, man, I can't go 'cause I might get shot so I'm going to send my wife...oh, and take a guitar player and a comedian with you.'"

He said the "scariest" part of the trip was wondering where he'd eat next. "I think the only 'red-phone' moment was: 'Do we eat here or at the next place.'"

Sounds like the Hillary is, once AGAIN, distorting reality.

This time the joke is on her.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/03/sinbad_unloads_on_hillary_clin.html

Why Does McCain Hate Kansas?

*** Update *** It is worse then people thought. Take a look at this ABC News story: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4440418&page=1

__________

It appears now that McCain was a major player in steering the much reported Air Force refueling tanker deal to the Europeans.

Why would he do this when we need the jobs so badly right here in Kansas?

It makes no sense on the surface but I am willing to bet as the details emerge there were significant political kickbacks involved including, but not limited to, donations to his campaign.

I think we need a president that is more concerned about jobs for Americans then jobs for Europeans!

Monday, March 10, 2008

Ferraro... Racist Comment


If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept. - Geraldine Ferraro



Source - HuffingtonPost.com

Monster Hillary



Ms. Powers was recently dismissed from the Obama campaign for saying what is really true.

A "monster" is someone who lies, steals, cheats, deceives and distorts their way to the top. Hillary fits that bill to a tee:

Lies: Saying Obama is not "really" against the war.

Stealing: Let's counting MI and FL, isn't that stealing an election that does not count?

Cheating: Lawsuits in Nevada and Texas challenging the legality of those contests.

Deceiving: Where are the tax returns? Where are the Clinton presidential records?

Distorts: Ms. Powers comments about Iraq... of course the president will need to evaluate the situation on the ground... duh!!!

This list could go on and on... the fake crying, the "I am honored to stand with Barack" followed by the "How dare you..." comments, the Jessie Jackson comment, the VP comments, demeaning Mississippi, Delegates matter oops I mean big states matter, caucus states don't matter, little states don't matter, Virginia does not matter, I have more experience cause I am old argument, I brokered peace in other parts of the World <-- lies, I helped workers at Walmart while on their board for years, the ""fairy tale" comment, etc etc on and on!

Is this really what we want in a president?

Let's get past the Clintons, please!

Primary or Caucus, Obama winning

Obama's gotten more delegates via primaries than Clinton (1086 or 1088 depending on the certified California results) to Clinton's (1074 or 1076). So clearly, the caucuses are what's helped put Obama's delegate lead nearly out of reach but even when just measuring primaries, Obama's ahead.

-- from MSNBC

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Obama Wins Texas!

The final unofficial delegates result for Texas is 98 for Obama and 95 for Clinton.

Hillary is destroying the Dems chance this Fall by staying in the primary race.

It is all about her ego, period. The math is the math and she can not win.

Obama will win Wyoming, Mississippi and Michigan (if a re-vote take s place).

Her margins in Florida (if a re-vote take place) and Pennsylvania would not be enough.

Super-delegates need to step up and put an end to this wasteful ego trip by Hillary.

Evil can not defeat Hope this time!

Friday, March 7, 2008

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Old Man McSame

Here are today's headlines on MSNBC:
Foreclosures hit 23-year high | Analysis
Oil price spikes to a new record near $106
If you like this, vote for McCain... if you think we can do better vote for Obama.

Simple really!

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

On To The General!

The Democratic Primary Race is wrapped up. Hillary can not mathematically catch up. She FAILED to capture both Texas and Ohio by the needed double digit victories.

Obama was able to make significant inroads into her 20 point leads and stop her comeback. He won more delegates in Texas than she did even though she eck'd out a few more votes in the primary part of the contest.

It is now time to focus on McCain's and his "No we can't" message.

This is reality.

Hillary is just background noise at this point.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

One big win is not enough

It is time for her to get out... as the media trips over itself to to say she is back, she has now won the most delegates in just 2 of the last 15 contests.

As soon as the media wakes up from its koolaid high, and they start counting, they should realize it is over.

The math does not add up. She can not win the nomination and the longer she stays in the more she sets up a McCain victory in the fall.

Just like Ralph Nadar was the spoiler for Gore, Hillary is the spoiler this time.

GET OUT HILARY!

Who Do You Prefer?


Monday, March 3, 2008

Hillary's Scorched Earth Plan

Why would Hillary be fighting so dirty by tearing down Barack with unfair tactics for a primary she mathematically can not win?

It's easy, she is tearing him down to ensure a loss against McCain so she can run in 4 years.

The Clinton's are one thing, and that is "anything to win"; even if it means tearing the heart out of the Democratic Party.

It is pitiful!

It is Time to End It!

It has started, the Republicans have their man, now they are messing with our primary.

A week ago, a Republican friend of mine told me he was voting for Hillary in Ohio... not because he likes her, but because he wants to hurt the Dems chances in the fall.

Here comes that idiot Rush, encouraging Republicans to vote for her too. Anything to keep the primary fight going.

Today, I read that the Republican Governor of Florida is encouraging the Dems to do a re-vote... more meddling.

It is time to end this. Hillary does not have the delegates to win this thing.

Barring 20 point wins in both Texas and Ohio tomorrow, she needs to drop out for the sake of the party.

Clinton Trying to Move the Goal Posts... Again

From Politico.com....
_____________________________
TO: Interested Parties

From: David Plouffe, Campaign Manager, Obama for America

RE: The Real Meaning of March 4th

Clinton Chief Strategist Mark Penn: “After March 4th, over 3000 delegates will be committed, and we project that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will be virtually tied with 611 delegates still to be chosen in Pennsylvania and other remaining states. Again and again, this race has shown that it is voters and delegates who matter, not the pundits or perceived ‘momentum.’” [Mark Penn memo, 2/13/08]

Clinton aide Guy Cecil: "We think that at the end of the day on March 4 we will be within 25 delegates.” [Politico, 2/13/08]

Howard Wolfson: “I Think We Will Be Ahead In The Delegate Race After Texas And Ohio.” [Clinton campaign conference call, 2/11/08]

New York Times: “Clinton advisers have said Mrs. Clinton must win the Texas and Ohio primaries by at least 10 percentage points if she has any hope of catching up with Mr. Obama in the delegate count, particularly because he has shown momentum recently at picking up support from elected officials who count as superdelegates.” [NYT, 2/22/08]

-------------------------------------------

By their own clear definition of where they expected and believed they needed to be after Ohio and Texas, the Clinton campaign will fall terribly short on March 4th. The Obama pledged delegate lead stands at 162. The question for the Clinton campaign if they do not significantly erode that lead on Tuesday is what plausible path they have to even up the pledged delegates in the remaining contests.

There are 611 pledged delegates left after March 4th’s contests. They would need to win at least 62% of all remaining pledged delegates to get back to even. And while they have often talked about Pennsylvania – where public polls show their lead deteriorating rapidly – the Wyoming caucuses on March 8th and Mississippi primary or March 11th could potentially result in more pledged delegates netted to the winner than on March 4th.

So it is clear that narrow popular vote wins in Texas and Ohio will do very little to improve their nearly impossible path to the nomination. If they do not win Texas and Ohio by healthy double digit margins – and they led by healthy double digit margins as recently as two weeks ago - they will be facing almost impossible odds to reverse the delegate math.

While the Clintons gamely continue to try to move the goal posts, at some point there has to be a reckoning. It is a very simple question – what is their path to secure the nomination? No amount of spin can change the math. We look forward to their tortured answers on Wednesday morning.

The Clinton campaign has insisted that this is a race about delegates. And we agree. The tale of March 4th is not who wins what states but where the delegate battle stands after all the delegate yield for all four of these contests have been allocated.

Obama & Clinton Response to Autism Questionnaire

If you care about Autism, then read this:

http://www.sarnet.org/lib/todaySAR.htm

More Fear... subtle-like

Hillary: Obama Not Muslim "As Far As I Know"

Check out this article about Hillary trying infuse doubt about Obama being a Christian. She was interviewed by 20/20 and gave a very specifically-worded answer that shows she will say anything to get elected. Is this what we want in a president?

link

Hope is Happening!

Think about the past 20 years in politics? When is the last time you felt hopeful for the future.

For me it was when a Tom Harkin was running for president. He had a populous message based on cutting military costs and instead focusing on our schools, health care system, infrastructure, environment and other domestic priorities.

I was glad to see a Democrat win that election. Bill Clinton was exciting to watch and he sure could speak well. He did good by the economy but there were some terrible, aches that came with it.

The loss of the House and Senate to Republicans set up terrible polarizing political battles. I stood by him and Hillary and was not willing to let the Republicans say horrible things about our President. Then came the infidelity. Now it was tougher and I often felt that I had been duped.

I see a chance to get past that type of politics. To have a new leader that just does not believe in it. You can see this in Barack Obama. It is true that from time to time he has been sucked in to the negative tones that the Clinton campaign has set but on par, he has stayed well above it.

His message has been consistent. It has not changed from contest to contest. He has some unpopular views that he believes in and will not shy away from i.e. talking to our enemies.

That says a lot about his character. It makes me believe that he will do what he says. That he will not suddenly morph into something else once elected.

A young, straight talking, charismatic leader is what America needs more than ever. McCain has had his chance, Clinton has had her's, it is time for something new and fresh.

Like JFK before, like the messages of MLK; Obama gives us a chance to do something truly great.

Hope is here and it is staying.

Saturday, March 1, 2008

When Bill was Good

This ad uses Bill's words against Hillary... the Clintons really will just say anything to win:

Clinton & Sexual Harrassment

I was surprised to read this story about Hillary not returning donations from individuals at International Profit Associates (IPA).

IPA is the company that is involved in one of the worse sexual harassment cases ever.

Considering her "denounce" and "condemn" argument during the last debate I am pretty shocked that the campaign has actually "refused" to return the donations.

I don't think my daughter deserves that type of leadership on such an important issue as sexual harassment.

Here is the article --> link

Latest Polls Texas & Ohio

It is tight as can be, but remember Clinton needs to win huge to change the delegate math.

Texas Polls

Ohio Polls

Ratings, not Reality

The media is loving the fight between Obama and Clinton, it is driving their ratings through the roof with a rare longer than expected primary fight on the Democratic side.

It is in their interest to make the race seem closer than it is.

But here is the reality and you can crunch the numbers yourself, by going to any of the major news sites.

If Clinton does not win by huge margins, and I mean 20 points or better in Ohio and Texas, she can not win the nomination without most of Obama's super delegates switching to support her.

It just seems amazing to me that the Clinton campaign is getting away with leading the media by the nose to change expectations. The Clinton camp is saying such things as Obama has to win all 4 contest Monday. They are not saying that for the face value of the comment. They are saying it so that people will think, "OK, well Obama better at least win Ohio and Texas".

They are trying to move the expectation for 20 point wins by Clinton, which is highly unlikely, to more modest results. This would make it seem like any success is a momentum changer when in reality it is not.

Don't believe the hype. Clinton must win by 20 points in BOTH Ohio or Texas otherwise this game is over.


Here is a good story from Bloomberg --> link

Fear Again - Only the Weak are Scared

All day the media reports on Clinton's sustained attack on Barack using fear as a weapon.

So who is this scared? Only the weak.

For those that are confident that the World should be lead by a hopeful message this message is seen as an obscene assault on their intelligence.

Pick what you group below you want to belong to and vote accordingly.

HOPEFUL LEADERS
Abe Lincoln
FDR
JFK
MLK
Barack Obama

FEAR MONGERING LEADERS
Andrew Jackson
Nixon
George W Bush
Guliani
Hillary Clinton